In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law

83 Ohio St. 3d 1476 | Ohio | 1998

This case was opened upon the filing of an objection to an order of the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. Whereas movant Mark Szezepinski’s objection does not contain proof of service as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that movant’s objection be¡ and hereby is, stricken, and this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.