18 F. Cas. 465 | E.D. Mich. | 1872
In answer to the three questions above certified, the court decides: Section 17 of the act provides that the assignee “shall be allowed and may retain, out of money in his hands, all the necessary disbursements made by him in the discharge of his duty, and a reasonable compensation for his services, in the discretion of the court.” Section 28 makes a specific allowance to the assignee, of a certain per centum “on all moneys received and paid out by him” in addition to the allowances authorized by section seventeen. See In re Dean [Case No. 8.600]. It is under these provisions, and these alone, that the right of assignees to charge the estate for disbursements and services must be determined. The allowance provided by section 28 is specific, and being a mere matter of computation, may be charged up by the assignee directly against funds in his hands, so soon as the "amount received and paid out by him” is ascertained; not so, however, with the allowances authorized by section seventeen. These allowances are in the discretion of the court, and can be made only upon a specific application to the court, and a showing that the disbursements and services for which such allowances are asked, were necessary, and are reasonable in amount. This is clearly contemplated by general order 5. defining the powers of registers in bankruptcy, in which it is provided, among other things, that the registers may conduct proceedings where uncontested in relation to ordering payment of rates and taxes, “and salary or wages of persons in the employment of the assignee,” and “taking evidence concerning expenses and charges against the bankrupt’s estate.” Under this order the register may hear and determine such application when uncontested. In re Lane [Id. 8.-042]. And it is preferable that such hearing should be had before the register, because, having the proceedings all before him. he is better able to judge of the exigencies upon which the necessity of the disbursements and services and the reasonableness of the amounts charged depend.
It would be difficult, and I think impracticable, to prescribe any general rule defining the circumstances under which, and extent to which, an assignee is at liberty to charge the assets of the estate in his hands for professional and clerical services in the execution of his trust. This must be left to be decided in each individual case according to its peculiar exigencies.
The answer to the first and second questions, therefore, must be that the assignee is not at liberty to charge the assets of the estate in his hands, for professional and clerical services rendered him in the execution of his trust, until the same shall have been first duly allowed by the court.
The answer to the third question is partly anticipated in what has been already said. The assignee may, of course, apply to the court in the first instance, for authority to employ professional or clerical assistance, but in such case the court could do but little more than grant suc-h authority in general terms, leaving the instances in and to which such assistance may be employed, largely to the discretion of the assignee, as emergencies shall arise, making such assistance necessary. Such authority, I think, the assignee already possesses under his general powers, subject however, to the control of the court; such power must be used by him cautiously and in the exercise of a sound discretion, and with the understanding that any abuse of it will be corrected by the court when applied to for authority to charge the estate for such
The application should contain a brief statement of the circumstances out of which the necessity for the disbursements, and the professional or clerical assistance, and the as-signee’s own services, arose, and from which the reasonableness of the amounts claimed therefor may appear, and it should be verified by the assignee. In case the application accompanies the final account, it will, of course, be laid before the creditors at the same time, and if they assent or fail to object to the same, and the items and amounts appear to be just and reasonable, all further inquiry may be dispensed with.
In this case the assignee, laboring, no doubt, under a misapprehension as to his legal rights and duties in this regard, seems to have assumed to judge for himself, not only as to the necessity of the disbursements and services, but also as to the reasonableness of the amounts, and so charged the same directly to the assets of the estate in his hands, without first having obtained an allowance of the same. The register was, therefore, correct in refusing to audit and pass the account under the circumstances stated by him in his certificate, without a proper showing by the assignee of the necessity of the professional and clerical assistance, and for his own services, charged in the account. The assignee has, however, now supplemented his account with a particular statement as to the charges for clerk hire, and as to such portion of the charges for professional sendees as do not explain themselves, and has also submitted to an oral examination before me in relation thereto, and also in relation to his own services, and the particulars thereof, from all of which it satisfactorily appears that the pro-fesssional and clerical services and the services of the assignee, charged in his account, were necessary in the execution of his trust, and that the charges therefor are reasonable in amount; the same must, therefore, be allowed.
It will be observed, that, in this particular case, the assignee has not been required to conform, in all respects, to the general rule above laid down; as, for instance, he has not been required to present a new account, omitting the charges for professional and clerical assistance, and for his own services, other than his per centum, under section 28, and then to present a separate application for their allowance. This must be understood as an exception merely as to this particular case, and as in nowise qualifying the general rule.
