History
  • No items yet
midpage
in Re: Naveed Klair and Hufsa Cheema
05-15-00462-CV
| Tex. App. | Apr 23, 2015
|
Check Treatment

*1 DENY; and Opinion Filed April 23, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00462-CV

IN RE NAVEED KLAIR AND HUFSA CHEEMA, Relators Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-11404 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck Relators filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial court to vacate its order setting aside the default judgment relator obtained against two of the real parties in interest and granting real parties in interest a new trial. We have recently declined to extend merits based mandamus review to trial court orders granting new trial following bench trials. See In re Dixon , No. 05-15-00242-CV, 2015 WL 1183596, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 16, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (declining to extend merits based mandamus review to case in which elected judge of the trial court granted new trial following a bench trial to an assigned judge); In re Foster , No. 05-15-00179-CV, 2015 WL 682335, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 18, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (declining to extend mandamus review to order granting new trial following bench trial). Our reasoning applies with similar force to trial court orders granting new trial following default judgments.

We DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

/David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE

150462F.P05

–2–

Case Details

Case Name: in Re: Naveed Klair and Hufsa Cheema
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 23, 2015
Docket Number: 05-15-00462-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.