In re Myles N.
Respondent failed to preserve her contention that an inadequate foundation had been laid for the admission of the agency’s progress notes, and we decline to review it. In any event, the
Respondent’s claim that Family Court failed to state the grounds for the permanent neglect finding (see
The court’s termination of respondent’s parental rights was entered on default and is thus not appealable (see Matter of Rosa S., 38 AD3d 216 [2007]). Were it properly before us, we would affirm. A preponderance of the evidence supported Family Court’s determination that it was in the child’s best interests (see