History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Moon
244 N.Y.S.2d 865
N.Y. App. Div.
1963
Check Treatment

— Order unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs, and matter remitted to the Oneida Family Court for a new hearing. Memorandum: The conduct of the fact-finding hearing was not in accordance with the provisions of section 742 of the Family Court Act. If we should assume that there was any “ evidence ” produced, the determination of delinquency was not based on a preponderance as required by subdivision (b) of section 744 of that act. (Appeal from order of Oneida Family Court adjudicating the respondent a juvenile delinquent.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky, and Noonan, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Moon
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 12, 1963
Citation: 244 N.Y.S.2d 865
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.