History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Millar
35 N.Y.2d 767
NY
1974
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: A majority of the court would have preferred that before the final adjudication of neglect there would have been testimonial evidence of a psychological expert of the potential risks to the child while in the care of the purportedly ill mother. All the court agree that the staleness of the appeal makes incongruous "any suggestion that the matter be remitted for further proceeding and that such a remission would be detrimental to the welfare of the child.

Concur: Chief Judge Rreitel and Judges Jasen, G-abrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Millar
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 14, 1974
Citation: 35 N.Y.2d 767
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.