In re Miguel M.-R.B. Graham-Windham, Inc.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner moved for leave to amend the petition to add a necessary party beyond the applicable statute of limitations. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the motion, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding (see Matter of Boston Culinary Group, Inc. v New York State Olympic Regional Dev. Auth., 18 AD3d 1103 [2005]; Matter of Lodge v D’Aliso, 2 AD3d 525 [2003]).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions either are improperly raised for the first time on appeal or need not be reached in light of our determination. Miller, J.P., Rivera, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.