History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Meinhardt
202 Ill. App. 266
Ill. App. Ct.
1916
Check Treatment
Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Execution, § 295*—what is not conclusive as to whether malice was gist of action. The mere fact that the statement of claim, filed in an action in which a capias ad satisfaciendum issued, does not disclose that malice was of the gist of the action does not entitle an insolvent debtor to release from imprisonment under such an execution, since the evidence offered on the trial may have been sufficient to support the judgment on which the capias was issued.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Meinhardt
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 19, 1916
Citation: 202 Ill. App. 266
Docket Number: Gen. No. 21,879
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.