History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleisher v. Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg
803 F.2d 1085
9th Cir.
1986
Check Treatment

The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc rehearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 35(b). The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.

With this order, the slip opinion filed August 13,1986 [796 F.2d 1165], is amended by adding a new footnote 26, on page 46 [p. 1188] at the end of the second sentence in the second full paragraph ending with “sanctioning authority,” and renumbering footnote 26 at the end of the paragraph to be footnote 27, as follows:

“Nothing we have said in this opinion should be construed to impair in any way, nor to preclude, an award based on bad faith conduct under the court’s inherent power, if found to be appropriate. See, e.g., Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752 [100 S.Ct. 2455, 65 L.Ed.2d 488] (1980).”

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleisher v. Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 6, 1986
Citation: 803 F.2d 1085
Docket Number: 84-5957
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.