In re Mary Ann D.
We find that the Rockland Psychiatric Center (hereinafter the Center) has met its burden of demonstrating that the appellant lacks the capacity to make a reasoned decision regarding the proposed treatment (see, Rivers v Katz,
We also find that, under the circumstances, the proposed treatment is narrowly tailored to preserve the patient’s liberty interest (see, Rivers v Katz, supra; Matter of Eleanor R. v South Oaks Hosp., supra; Matter of Adele S. v Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, supra). The treatment would allow the