History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Marvin
232 A.D. 773
N.Y. App. Div.
1931
Check Treatment

Upon investigation we find that nothing has been presented to warrant further ration on the part of this court. It appears from the record of the trial that the decision was made upon conflicting evidence. The decision was reversed, and the reversal constituted a complete vindication of Miss Simmons, the complainant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Marvin
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1931
Citation: 232 A.D. 773
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.