History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Martino
668 A.2d 491
Pa.
1995
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 1995, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated October 13,1995, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

MONTEMURO, J., participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.J.A. No. 701(f).

Case Details

Case Name: In re Martino
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 13, 1995
Citation: 668 A.2d 491
Docket Number: No. 646, Disciplinary Docket No. 2 — Supreme Court; No. 105 DB 88 Disciplinary Board
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In