56 P. 470 | Idaho | 1899
— The defendant applies for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition alleges, as ground for the writ, the following, to wit: 1. That the act approved March 6, 1893, which amends the information act of 1891, was not passed in the manner required by the constitution, and is void; 2. That the information was not verified by the oath of the county attorney who filed it, or by any one else.
The facts alleged in the petition show that the petitioner was arrested about December 6, 1898, under a cpmplaint charging him with grand larceny committed in Ada county, and was on
It is a well-settled rule of law that irregularities in an indictment or information are not open to review on application
The object of this proceeding on the part of the petitioner is to review and take advantage of alleged irregularities in a