History
  • No items yet
midpage
In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke
127 Wis. 2d 444
| Wis. | 1986
|
Check Treatment
127 Wis.2d 444 (1985)
379 N.W.2d 853

IN RE the MARRIAGE OF: Judith M. STEINKE, Petitioner-Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
Robert Allen STEINKE, Respondent.

No. 84-1337.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Filed January 24, 1986.

PER CURIAM.(On motion for reconsideration).

The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.

In In re Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. 2d 372, 389, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), immediately above the mandate, we delete the phrase "the actuarial present value of the entire interest at the time of trial was approximately $15,900."

We add the following sentence immediately above the mandate: An opinion as to actuarial present value was included in the record as an answer to an interrogatory, i.e., $15,900, but was not received in evidence. The amount is not conclusive on remand. The trial court must evaluate and include the interest in the pension in the property division; the parties may introduce evidence of the value of the pension interest.

Case Details

Case Name: In RE MARRIAGE OF STEINKE v. Steinke
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 24, 1986
Citation: 127 Wis. 2d 444
Docket Number: 84-1337
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.