History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Maclin-Zimmer-McGill Tobacco Co.
262 F. 635
D.C. Cir.
1920
Check Treatment
ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a Patent Office decision refusing registration to the words “El Gallo,” as a trade-mark for tobacco.

“El Gallo” is the Spanish for “The Rooster,” and it appears that “Our Rooster” and a picture of a rooster have been registered as a trade-mark for tobacco by another concern. In Nestle & A. S. C. Milk Co. v. Walter Baker & Co., 37 App. D. C. 148, 152, we ruled that “Milkmaid” and a pictorial representation of a milkmaid meant the same to the public, and that the “right to employ one necessarily includes the right to employ both.” It matters not that appellant has employed the Spanish language, instead of English. In re Bradford Dyeing Ass’n, 46 App. D. C. 512.

The decision was right, and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Maclin-Zimmer-McGill Tobacco Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jan 5, 1920
Citation: 262 F. 635
Docket Number: No. 1241
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In