History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Lotsof
34 N.Y.2d 952
NY
1974
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We affirm the order of the Appellate Division in the absence of any proof in the record that the applicant was an actual resident of the State of New York at the time of filing his application for admission to practice (CPLR 9406, subd. 3). In that view of the matter we do not reach the question of the validity of a durational residence requirement.

We take this opportunity to invite attention to what appears to us to be the high desirability of legislative reconsideration of the broad basis of eligibility for admission to the Bar, including requirements as to both residency and employment (cf. L. 1974, ch. 75).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens concur in Per Curiam opinion.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Lotsof
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 15, 1974
Citation: 34 N.Y.2d 952
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.