In re Loretta C.
The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The victim’s testimony established that appellant engaged in conduct evincing an intent to damage the victim’s car, and the expert testimony established that the damage met the statutory threshold of $250 (