History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Lewis
2025 Ohio 977
Ohio
2025
Check Treatment

*1 [This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at __ Ohio St.3d __.]

I N RE L EWIS .

[Cite as In re Lewis , 2025-Ohio-977.]

(No. 2025-0392 — Submitted March 19, 2025 — Decided March 21, 2025.) N ERTIFICATION OF EFAULT OF C HILD UPPORT O RDER . ____________________ On March 19, 2025, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R.V(18)(A)(3), the

director of the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court of Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination of default of a child support order by respondent, Matthew Merritt Lewis, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Ohio. Upon consideration thereof and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(18)(A)(4),

it is ordered and decreed that respondent, Matthew Merritt Lewis, Attorney Registration No. 0092816, last known business address in Canfield, Ohio, is suspended from the practice of law for an interim period, effective as of the date of this entry. It is further ordered that this matter is referred to disciplinary counsel

for investigation and commencement of disciplinary proceedings. It is further ordered that respondent immediately cease and desist from

the practice of law in any form and that respondent is forbidden to appear on behalf of another before any court, judge, commission, board, administrative agency, or other public authority. It is further ordered that effective immediately, respondent is

forbidden to counsel, advise, or prepare legal instruments for others or in any manner perform legal services for others. *2 UPREME OURT OF HIO It is further ordered that respondent is divested of each, any, and all

of the rights, privileges, and prerogatives customarily accorded to a member in good standing of the legal profession of Ohio. It is further ordered that before entering into an employment,

contractual, or consulting relationship with any attorney or law firm, respondent shall verify that the attorney or law firm has complied with the registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. V(23)(C). If employed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(23), respondent shall refrain from direct client contact except as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(23)(A)(1) and from receiving, disbursing, or otherwise handling any client trust funds or property. It is further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the

practice of law until (1) the Board of Professional Conduct files in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(18)(D)(1)(b) with the Supreme Court a certified copy of a judgment entry reversing the determination of default under a child support order, or it files in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(18)(D)(1)(c) with the Supreme Court a notice from a court or child support enforcement agency that respondent is no longer in default under a child support order or is subject to a withholding or deduction notice or a new or modified child support order to collect current support or any arrearage due under the child support order that was in default and is complying with that notice or order, and (2) this court orders respondent reinstated to the practice of law. It is further ordered that respondent shall keep the clerk and

disciplinary counsel advised of any change of address where respondent may receive communications. It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this

court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and

January Term, 2025

timeliness of filings. All case documents are subject to Sup.R. 44 through 47 which govern access to court records. It is further ordered that service shall be deemed made on respondent

by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, to respondent’s last known address. It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).

K ENNEDY , C.J., and F ISCHER , E W INE , B RUNNER , D ETERS , H AWKINS , and HANAHAN , JJ., concur.

_________________

Case Details

Case Name: In re Lewis
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 21, 2025
Citation: 2025 Ohio 977
Docket Number: 2025-0392
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.