History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Larkins
48 Ohio St. 2d 21
Ohio
1976
Check Treatment
-Per Curiam.

• Appellant’s .amended petition for a. writ of habeas corpus seeks release on the ground of a claimed denial of due process because of the alleged inadequate representation by counsel at the time of appellant’s commitment.

There is nothing in the. record’of this habeas corpus proceeding before the Court .of Appeals to support the claims made by appellant.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing ap-r pellarit’s amended petition inr- habeas corpus is, accordingly, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, CorrigaN, Stern, CelebRezze, AV. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Larkins
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 27, 1976
Citation: 48 Ohio St. 2d 21
Docket Number: No. 76-367
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.