History
  • No items yet
midpage
in Re Kimberly Marks
01-15-00087-CV
| Tex. App. | Mar 11, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/11/2015 11:31:03 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk *1 ACCEPTED 01-15-00087-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/11/2015 11:31:03 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK No. 01-15-00087-CV ______________ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS

at Houston ______________ IN RE KIMBERLY MARKS Relator _________________ Original Proceeding from the 310 Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas Cause No. 2013-73339 RELATOR’S OBJECTION TO EXHIBIT MR-2

Steven D. Poock State Bar Number 00794473

P.O. Box 984 Sugar Land, Texas 77487 Tel. (281) 277-7678 Fax (281) 277-7679 spoock@juno.com Attorney for Relator, KIMBERLY MARKS

No. 01-15-00087-CV KIMBERLY MARKS § IN THE FIRST

Relator §

§ COURT OF APPEALS v . §

§ HOUSTON, TEXAS THE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & §

PROTECTIVE SERVICES §

Real Party in Interest §

RELATOR’S OBJECTION TO EXHIBIT MR-2

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICE OF SAID COURT:

Relator Kimberly Marks Objects to the Department’s Exhibit MR-2, and in

support of said motion shows:

1. Kimberly Marks objects to Exhibit MR-2 attached to First Supplemental

Mandamus Record of Real Party in Interest [1] .

2. Exhibit MR-2 was not served on Kimberly Marks, was never served,

presented or made available to Counsel, was never offered as evidence, and was never

admitted as evidence. Moreover, an affidavit cannot be cross-examined, and counsel had

no opportunity to develop any counter-evidence as the affidavit does not appear on the

court’s website, it was not available to counsel, and it was not offered at the hearing.

Counsel for Kimberly Marks was completely unaware of the affidavit until it was filed

with the appellate court.

*3 3. Assuming the Department received an anonymous complaint, the proper

response, as detailed in Marks’ brief, is to afford Kimberly Marks her constitutionally

protected rights by first conducting an investigation (Chapter 261), then filing a SAPCR

(Chapter 262), obtaining a judicial finding of abuse or neglect, and then, upon a finding

of abuse or neglect, it would be appropriate for the Department to move the court for

Kimberly Marks to engage in child welfare services (Chapter 264). In the present case,

Kimberly Marks was dispossessed of her right to request a jury, was not afforded a full

adversarial hearing with 45 days notice, and the Department never obtained a finding of

abuse or neglect. Instead, with seven days notice, virtually no evidence, and nearly no

process, Relator lost her freedom and many of her constitutional rights, and was

subjected to invasive testing and being held in the courtroom against her will.

4. The right to forty-five days notice of trial is a constitutionally protected

right:

Rule 245 of the rules of civil procedure provides that a court may on its own

motion set a contested case for first setting for trial, with reasonable notice to the

parties of not less than forty-five days. See Tex.R.Civ.P. 245. This notice is

mandatory and involves the constitutionally protected right of due process. See

Transoceanic Shipping Co.. Inc. v. Gen'l Universal Sys., Inc., 961 S.W.2d 418,

420 n. 2 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 st Dist.] 1997, no writ).

Burress v. Richardson , 97 S.W.3d 806 (Tex.App.- Dallas 2003, no pet.)

PRAYER For the reasons listed above, Relator respectfully requests this Court to SUSTAIN

Relator’s objection to the Department’s Exhibit MR-2.

Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Steven Poock ___________________ Steven Poock P.O. Box 984 Sugar Land, Texas 77487 State Bar No. 00794473 spoock@juno.com (281) 242-9700 Telephone (281) 242-8340 Facsimile /s/ Tom Sanders ___________________ Tom Sanders P.O. Box 1860 Sugar Land, Texas 77487 State Bar No. 17609900 Tcsanders76@yahoo.com (281) 242-9700 Telephone (281) 242-8340 Facsimile ATTORNEYS FOR RELATOR KIMBERLY MARKS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the parties listed below on

this the 11 day of March, 2015.

/s/ Steven Poock _______________________ Steven Poock *5 Respondent: The Honorable Judge Lisa Millard

Presiding Judge of the 310 Judicial District Court 201 Caroline, 13 th Floor

Houston, TX 77002

Real Party in Interest: Damon Wayne Marks

1008 Railroad

Thornton, TX 76687

Real Party in Interest: Department of Family and Protective Services

Counsel Sandra Hachem

Sr. Assistant County Attorney

State Bar No. 08667060

1019 Congress, 17th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

Sandra.Hachem@cao.hctx.net

(713) 274.5293 (telephone)

(713) 437.4700 (facsimile)

[1] The First Supplemental Mandamus Record of Real Party in Interest was the initial Record filed by the Department.

Case Details

Case Name: in Re Kimberly Marks
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 11, 2015
Docket Number: 01-15-00087-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.