History
  • No items yet
midpage
in Re Kenneth L. Buholtz
05-21-00254-CV
| Tex. App. | Jul 26, 2021
|
Check Treatment

*1 DENY and Opinion Filed July 26, 2021

S

In The

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00254-CV

IN RE KENNETH L. BUHOLTZ, Relator Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 6 Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-01691-2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Goldstein Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus challenges various discovery rulings and the denial of his motion to transfer the case. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Because relator has not submitted an adequate record, we are unable to conduct a meaningful review of his claims. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.7(a)(1). Accordingly, we deny the petition without prejudice to refiling a record that complies with the Texas rules of appellate procedure.

Also before the Court is relator’s motion to transfer records. We deny the motion.

/Bonnie Lee Goldstein/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE

210254F.P05

–2–

Case Details

Case Name: in Re Kenneth L. Buholtz
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jul 26, 2021
Docket Number: 05-21-00254-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.