History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Kaiser
212 A.D. 831
N.Y. App. Div.
1925
Check Treatment

The appellant failed to comply with the rules in reference to perfecting his appeal. The appeal was, therefore, dismissed. In view of the fact that the interests of infants are involved, we have decided to grant a further extension of time, on condition that the appeal he perfected and brought on for argument on the first Monday of the March term. No further extension of time will be granted. The record of appeal now on file in this court is not properly here, and should be returned to the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Kaiser
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1925
Citation: 212 A.D. 831
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.