In re Joseph J.
In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (De Phillips, J.), entered November 13, 1992, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated October 22, 1992, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the second degree and assault in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed him with the Division for Youth, Title II, for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated October 22, 1992.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it was legally sufficient to support the findings of the Family Court. In order to hold an individual liable for the conduct of another, the prosecution must show that the individual acted with the mental culpability required to commit the crimes charged (see, Penal Law § 20.00; see also, People v McClary,
These uncontroverted facts were sufficient to establish that the appellant shared the intent to commit the acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute robbery in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 160.00), and assault in the third degree (see, Penal Law § 120.00; see, Matter of Juan J.,