History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: Jonathan Brunson
21-1741
| 4th Cir. | Sep 17, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Eugene Brunson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Eugene Brunson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his third motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently denied Brunson’s motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In re: Jonathan Brunson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 17, 2021
Docket Number: 21-1741
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.