In re John L.P.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the request of the appellant, a recently suspended attorney, for an adjournment to obtain new counsel where the appellant consented to the withdrawal of her attorney at the commencement of the hearing (see Hendry v Hilton, 283 App Div 168, 171 [1953]). Moreover, contrary to the appellant’s contention, the interim stay provision in
In addition, the appellant’s contention that the Supreme Court violated
The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Dillon, J.P., Santucci, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 20 Misc 3d 1111(A), 2008 NY Slip Op 51316(U).]