In re Jason J.
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court’s determination of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 622). The child has been in foster care since shortly after his birth in February 1997. Despite petitioner’s diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship since then, the relationship deteriorated and respondent visited the child only once during the seven months preceding the November 1999 fact-finding hearing. During that single visit there was no evidence of any bonding. Although respondent cooperated with petitioner in some areas and made limited progress in other areas, she has by her actions indicated that the development of a bond with her child is not a priority for her. Thus, respondent has failed to address and overcome the primary problem preventing her from reuniting with the child (see, Matter of Kerensa D. [appeal No. 2],
Further, the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to enter a suspended judgment (see, Matter of Matthew H.,