History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: Jamel Law
21-1772
| 4th Cir. | Sep 17, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamel C. Law, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamel C. Law petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for compassionate release. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied his motion on December 4, 2020. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Law’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In re: Jamel Law
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 17, 2021
Docket Number: 21-1772
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.