History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Ingalls Bros.
137 F. 517
2d Cir.
1905
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The referee rejected the claims, but the District Judge reversed his ruling, evidently in order to conform the practice in the Northern District to that followed in the Southern District. In re Seif (unreported). The opinion of the referee sets forth the facts, and contains a very full discussion of the questions of law involved, and we concur in his interpretation of the statute and in his conclusions. His opinion is not reported, but it may be printed as a supplement to this memorandum.

The order of the District Court is reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Ingalls Bros.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Mar 1, 1905
Citation: 137 F. 517
Docket Number: No. 121
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.