History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Hunt
103 Cal. 355
Cal.
1894
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The Court.

The children above named having been brought before the court by writ of habeas corpus, and the court being fully advised as to the matter, it is hereby ordered that said minor children be discharged from the custody of Frank Kane, and restored to the custody of the petitioner.

The father and mother, being the natural guardians of a child, can be deprived of the custody of its person only by a proceeding under section 203 of the Civil Code.

The proceeding by which the superior court has committed these children to the custody of a stranger is wholly unauthorized.






Concurrence Opinion

Garoutte, J., concurring.

I concur in the judgment, but am not prepared to coincide with the majority of the court upon the important question stated in the opinion as to the effect of section 203, without an opportunity for further examination.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Hunt
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 3, 1894
Citation: 103 Cal. 355
Docket Number: No. 21143
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.