In re Hughes

12 F. Cas. 829 | S.D.N.Y. | 1868

BLATCHFOR.D, District Judge.

In answer to the three questions certified in this case, the court replies: 1st. Where, on the return of an order to show cause before a register why a bankrupt should not be discharged. a creditor appears and opposes the discharge, the register must make a certificate of his proceedings, stating the opposition, and return the papers into court in like manner as if there were no opposition.

2d. An assignee must make his return, when requested by the bankrupt, under form No. 35, when he has in fact not received or paid any moneys on account of the estate, even though he may have reason to believe that he will thereafter receive moneys on account of the estate, as the proceeds of assets thereof.

3d. Under the provisions of section four of the act, and of general order No. 29, where an assignee examines a bankrupt before a register, under section twenty-six of the act, the assignee must pay the fees of the register for such examination, whether he has any assets of the estate or not. If there are assets, the court can, under general order No. 29, reimburse the assignee out of the assets. The bankrupt is not, under such circumstances, bound to pay the fees of the register. By the provisions of section twenty-eight, the assignee, if not in funds from the estate at any time, to a sufficient extent to defray the necessary expenses which will be required for the further execution of his trust, may require that the funds for that purpose shall be advanced or satisfactorily secured to him before he proceeds further. These funds must be advanced or secured by the party for whose benefit the expenses are to be incurred. If they are to be incurred in an examination of the bankrupt, under section twentj'-six, with a view to discover assets for the benefit of his creditors, they must be advanced or secured by the creditors. If they are to be incurred in a proceeding by the assignee which is a part of the proper steps preliminary to the discharge of the bankrupt, they must be advanced or secured by the bankrupt. The “expenses,” thus provided for by section twenty-eight, do not cover any allowance to the assignee for his services. Section twenty-eight does not provide for any allowance for such services, except by way of a percentage upon moneys received and paid out by the as-signee as assets of the estate. But, by section seventeen, the assignee is to be allowed a reasonable compensation for his services, in the discretion of the court; and, if there is any money in his hands, this compensation and all the necessary disbursements made by him in the discharge of his duty, may be retained by him out of such money. This allowance cannot be made until after the services are rendered, because, until the court is advised what the services have been, it cannot determine whether any particular amount of compensation for the services is or is not reasonable, unless perhaps it might, for specific acts, mainly of routine, prescribe specific fees. If there is no money in the hands of the assignee, the payment of the compensation referred to in section seventeen, if it is a compensation for services in steps properly preliminary to the discharge of the bankrupt, can, when the compensation has been allowed, be secured by a withholding by the court of the discharge of the bankrupt, until he makes the payment, on the ground that until then he has not in all things conformed to his duty under the act; and, if it is a compensation for services for which tin* bankrupt ought not to pay, its payment to the assignee can probably be secured by appropriate means. Compensation to the assignee for his services in an examination of the bankrupt, under section twenty-six. with a view to discover assets for the benefit of his creditors, is not to be paid by the bankrupt.

midpage