History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Hubert
99 N.J. Eq. 886
N.J.
1926
Check Treatment

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 887

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Hubert
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 17, 1926
Citation: 99 N.J. Eq. 886
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.