History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Hitchcock
81 Ohio St. 3d 1222
Ohio
1998
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.





Dissenting Opinion

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.,

dissenting. I would not dismiss this appeal as having been improvidently allowed. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and adopt its opinion in its entirety. The juvenile court infringed on the probate court’s exclusive jurisdiction when it effectively denied appellees’ adoption petition. The determination of the fitness of the parties to adopt is reserved for the probate court’s adjudication.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Hitchcock
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 11, 1998
Citation: 81 Ohio St. 3d 1222
Docket Number: No. 96-2641
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.