History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Hernandez
298 F. 1019
D.C. Cir.
1924
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office

tribunals refusing to allow this reissue' application with broader claims, it having been filed almost three years after the issuance of the original patent. The Patent Office tribunals have carefully considered the facts and have found that no special circumstances have been shown to excuse the delay. We concur in this finding. See In re Starkey, 21 App. D. C. 519, In re Ams, 29 App. D. C. 91, and In re Otto, 259 Fed. 985, 49 App. D. C. 89. The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Hernandez
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jun 2, 1924
Citation: 298 F. 1019
Docket Number: Patent Appeal No. 1663
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.