History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Haring
142 A.D. 904
N.Y. App. Div.
1910
Check Treatment

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs, but without prejudice to any application that the respondent may be advised to make for amendment of the order whereby the commissioners were appointed. (See Matter of Bley v. Village of Hamburg, 84 App. Div. 23.) Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Haring
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1910
Citation: 142 A.D. 904
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.