History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Hammond
9 F. Supp. 628
United States District Court f...
1934
Check Treatment
HOPKINS, District Judge.

The above-named bankrupt, W. H. Hammond, having filed his petition for discharge, and said petition having been referred to Frank B. Bristow, one of the referees in bankruptcy of this court, to hear and report upon said petition, and said referee having filed his report showing that after due notice to all parties he held a hearing upon said petition and said report recommending that said petition for discharge be denied, for the reason that said W. H. Hammond has been granted a discharge in bankruptcy by this court within less than six years from this date, and-no exceptions having been filed to said report, and it appearing that said report *630should be confirmed and, said petition denied, now, therefore, after due consideration, it is ordered that said report be, and it hereby is, confirmed and the petition of said W. H. Hammond for his discharge be, and it hereby is, denied.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Hammond
Court Name: United States District Court for the District of Arkansas
Date Published: Nov 22, 1934
Citation: 9 F. Supp. 628
Docket Number: No. 3697
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.