History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Gunzberger
268 F. 673
M.D. Penn.
1920
Check Treatment
WITHER, District Judge.

The question presented in the certificate for review has been fully and well considered in an opinion filed by the learned referee, which lias the approval of the court and may be considered as expressing the opinion of the court. It follows that the exceptions filed are set aside, and the order of the referee, disallowing the claim oí J. E. Dayton Company for allowance of $115 out of the funds in hands of the trustee in bankruptcy, except as an unsecured claim, is hereby affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Gunzberger
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 1, 1920
Citation: 268 F. 673
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Penn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.