History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Greenberg
556 Pa. 101
Pa.
1999
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 1999, a Rule having been issued upon Lawrence D. Greenberg on January 12, 1999, to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered, upon consideration of the responses filed, the request for oral argument is denied, the Rule is made absolute and the Petition for Reinstatement is hereby denied. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Justice NEWMAN did not participate in this matter. Justice CAPPY dissents and would grant the Petition for Reinstatement. Justice NIGRO dissents and would grant the request for oral argument.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Greenberg
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 15, 1999
Citation: 556 Pa. 101
Docket Number: No. 762 Disciplinary Docket No. 2
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.