250 F. 997 | 2d Cir. | 1918
We need express no opinion further than to hold there was evidence sustaining the holding complained of, viz. that Johnson was not a creditor. Therefore there was no abuse of discretion and no error in matter of law in denying tire motion to reopen.
The order under review is reversed, excent as to the portion thereof denying the motion to reopen; in that respect it is affirmed. There will be no costs in this court.