History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Golden
285 A.D. 927
N.Y. App. Div.
1955
Check Treatment

—■ Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified so as to eliminate from the first decretal provision the concluding words “but this increase in respondent’s rent is to take effect only as of December 1, 1954,” without costs of this appeal. There was no warrant in law or in the exercise of discretion for fixing the effective date of the fair rental value other than the “ date [of] the application to the supreme court ” (L. 1945, ch. 314, § 4, subd. 1, as amd.; Matter of Flatto [Sandler], 279 App. Div. 714; Matter of FrmJcel [Fder], 277 App. Div. 968). Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Golden
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 1, 1955
Citation: 285 A.D. 927
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.