Lead Opinion
The decree denies petitioner’s application for a determination that a certain indenture, bearing date the 7th day of November, 1935, made by decedent, wherein she provided for payment of £1,000 to her daughter, Carmen Sylvia Bernheim, and two wills made by said decedent, one made in Jamaica, British West Indies, and the other in New York city, and the codicil to the will made in New York city be construed to mean that the decedent intended said £1,000 to be paid out of decedent’s property in New York.
Decree affirmed, with costs to the respondents payable out of the estate. No opinion.
Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents in opinion in which Cohn, J., concurs. [174 Misc. 923.]
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting). Although the circumstances referred to by the surrogate might perhaps, in the absence of other indications, justify an inference that it was the intention of the deceased to charge the sum of £1,000 against her Jamaica estate, they do not constitute an express declaration to that effect as required by the terms of her Jamaica will. It is manifest that that condition was imposed by the deceased in order to avoid the sale, at a sacrifice, of shares owned by her in a closely held Jamaica corporation.
The decree of the surrogate should be reversed and it should be held that the amount of £1,000 constitutes a charge against the New York estate of the deceased. Cohn, J., concurs.