History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Giuseppe Pileggi v.
697 F. App'x 203
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Giuseppe Pileggi, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Giuseppe Pileggi petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Pileggi’s Rule 41(g) motion without prejudice by order entered July 26, 2017, and dismissed his § 2255 motion by order entered September 1, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Pileggi’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Giuseppe Pileggi v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 14, 2017
Citation: 697 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: 17-1676
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.