History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Gillespie
18 Abb. N. Cas. 41
N.Y. Sur. Ct.
1886
Check Treatment
Rollins, Surr.

First—The taxes and expenses of

■administration up to and including this accounting are chargeable to the corpus of the estate.

Second—If the testator’s widow wishes to have possession of the residuary estate, it should be turned over to *45her upon her giving security to protect the remaindermen (Tyson v. Blake, 22 N. Y., 558 ; Matter of Fernbacher, 17 Abb. N. C., 339; Livingston v. Murray, 68 N. Y., 485) otherwise possession should be retained by the executor. In the latter event he will hold it in accordance with the doctrine of Spear v. Tinkham, 2 Barb. Ch., 211; Clark v. Clark, 8 Paige, 152; Covenhoven v. Shuler, 2 Paige, 122, 132.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Gillespie
Court Name: New York Surrogate's Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1886
Citation: 18 Abb. N. Cas. 41
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sur. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.