History
  • No items yet
midpage
686 So. 2d 816
La.
1997

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

Respondent, an attorney licensed to practice law in Maine and Louisiana, was the subject of bar discipline proceedings in Maine involving ten complaints based on his neglect of legal matters entrusted to him.1 On August 11, 1995, the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, with reinstatement conditioned upon restitution and other conditions, such as seeking counseling and treatment for his avoidance problem.

On the showing made by disciplinary counsel regarding the disciplinary proceedings in the State of Maine, and considering that respondent was given thirty days to respond to disciplinary counsel’s filing, but did not do so, and in light of the provisions of La.Sup. Ct. Rule XIX, § 21 regarding reciprocal discipline, it is the decision of the court that the same discipline imposed in Maine be imposed in Louisiana. Accordingly, it is ordered that Gordon Pearse Gates is suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for a period of one year, under the same terms as his suspension from the practice of law in Maine.

Notes

Johnson, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

. Six of these involved domestic matters, one involved a title search, one involved a criminal charge of illegal attachment of a license plate, one involved an appeal of a murder conviction, and one involved a collection matter.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Gates
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Jan 10, 1997
Citations: 686 So. 2d 816; 1997 WL 11238; 1997 La. LEXIS 210; No. 96-B-0465
Docket Number: No. 96-B-0465
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    In re Gates, 686 So. 2d 816