The opinion of the court was delivered by
Clara Gassaway, a girl thirteen years of age, was found by the probate court of Wyandotte county to be leading a vagrant life and not attending school, and was committed to the state industrial school for girls, where she is now detained by its matron. By this proceeding she seeks to obtain her release. The illegality of her detention, as claimed, is the lack of power in the probate court to commit her to such school. The following are her contentions : First, that the powers of the probate court are limited by section 8 of article 3 of the constitution, and that the authority attempted to be exercised in
Section 1 of article 3 of the constitution places the judicial power of the state in the supreme court, district courts, probate courts, justices of the peace, and such other courts, inferior to the supreme court, as may be provided by law. It will be observed that a probate court is a judicial tribunal. Section 8 of the same article provides that probate courts shall have such jurisdiction of the property of certain persons as shall be provided by law, and shall also have jurisdiction in habeas corpus. This section does not prohibit the legislature from imposing other and additional judicial duties on the probate courts not inconsistent with, and the exercise of which would not interfere with, the performance of those duties fixed by the constitution.
Section 7147 of the General Statutes of 1901 confers power on the probate courts to commit to the industrial school for girls “any girl under sixteen years of age who is incorrigible and habitually disregards the commands of her father, mother, or guardian, and who leads a vagrant life, or resorts to immoral places or practices, and neglects or refuses to perform labor suitable to her years and condition, and to attend school.” Before a girl can be committed a complaint in writing must be filed stating the charges made, and the probate court must give five days’ notice to all persons interested before an investigation may be held, which, of course, includes the girl against whom
In Young v. Ledrick,
The petitioner is remanded.
