In re Francisco R.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
“The determination whether to relieve a party of an order entered upon his or her default is a matter left to the sound discretion of the Family Court” (Matter of Samantha P., 297 AD2d 348 [2002]; see Matter of Samaria Ann B., 293 AD2d 532 [2002]). To vacate the order, the mother was obligated to show that there was a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense (see Matter of Iris R., 295 AD2d 521, 522 [2002]; Matter of Angel Joseph S., 282 AD2d 752 [2001]; Matter of Latisha I., 238 AD2d 340 [1997]). We agree with the Family Court that the mother did not make the requisite showing.
Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.