94 Pa. Commw. 322 | Pa. Commw. Ct. | 1986
Opinion by
Michael Foraker (appellant) was dismissed from his position as a police officer by the Norristown Police Department. He appealed the dismissal to the
The sole question presented by this case is whether the provisions of Section 46191 of The Borough Code,
Section 46191 of The Borough Code provides, in pertinent part, that “[a] 11 parties concerned shall have immediate right of appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of the County . . . [and] [s]uch appeal shall be taken within sixty days from the date of entry by the Commission of its final order. . . .”
(b) Other courts. — Except as otherwise provided in subsections (a) 'and (c), an appeal from a tribunal or other government unit to a court or from a court to an 'appellate court must be commenced within thirty days after the entry of the order from which the appeal is taken, in the case of an interlocutory or final order.4
Although the Judiciary Act Repealer Act (JARA)
(a) Whenever a statute purports to be a revision of all statutes upon a particular subject, or sets up a general or exclusive system covering the entire subject matter of a former statute and is intended as a substitute for such former statute, such statute shall be construed to supply 'and therefore to repeal all former statutes upon the same subject.
(b) Whenever a general statute purports to establish a uniform and mandatory system covering a class of subjects, such statute shall be construed to supply and therefore to repeal pre-existing local or special statutes on the same class of subjects.
In the case of Crown v. Township of Ross, 68 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 588, 449 A.2d 878 (1982), aff’d sub nom. Appeal of Chartiers Valley School District, 501 Pa. 620, 462 A.2d 673 (1983), this Court found that ■the Judicial Code is 'an effort to create a uniform system covering appeals. In its affirmation of Crown, the Supreme Court stated that <£[g]iven the overriding purpose of the Judicial Code, the obvious intent of the legislature in enacting this section was to make uniform the appeal period applicable to oases heard by our courts.” Appeal of Chartiers Valley School District, 501 Pa. 620, 625, 462 A.2d 673, 676 (1983). Since the Judicial Code purports to establish a uniform system for appeal periods heard by the courts, Section 1971 of the Act mandates that all pre-existing local or special statutes on the same class of subjects are impliedly repealed.
In Crown we held that Section 55645 of the First Class Township Code, Act of June 24, 1931, P.L. 1206,
The general repealer of JABA supports this conclusion. §20002(g) of JABA states:
All other parts of those acts which are specified in this section and all other acts and parts of acts are hereby repealed insofar as they are in any manner inconsistent with this act or the act of which this is a suppelment.7
Therefore, we affirm the trial court.
Order
And Now, January 24,1986, the order of the Court of ¡Common Pleas of Montgomery County, No. 82-14575, dated January 18, 1988, is affirmed.
Act of June 3, 1971, P.L. 145, as amended, 53 P.S. §46191.
42 Pa. C. S. §5571.
53 P.S. §46191.
42 Pa. C. S. §5571.
42 Pa. C. S. §§20001-20004.
1 Pa. c. S. §1971.
42 Pa. C. S. §20002(g).