In re Felipe G.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We disagree with the appellant‘s contention that his placement should have been less restrictive. The Family Court has broad discretion in entering dispositional orders (see Matter of Neville G., 293 AD2d 471 [2002]; Matter of Naiquan T., 265 AD2d 331, 332 [1999]; see also
Miller, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.