In re Feldser, 134 F. 307

In re Feldser

134 F. 307 | E.D. Pa. | 1905

HOLLAND, District Judge.

This is a certificate of review to the decision of the referee directing Samuel Feldser to pay over to J. Howard Reber, trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Rosa Feldser, bankrupt, the sum of $2,800. The referee, after taking 188 pages of testimony upon the rule of Samuel Feldser to show cause why he should not pay over $3,500 to the trustee, filed an opinion in which he finds that Samuel Feldser has in his possession or control the sum of $2,800, and directs him to pay the same over to the trustee. I have gone over the evidence and the opinion of the referee very carefully, and I am convinced that he is correct in his conclusions of law and fact, with the exception of the amount which he finds should be paid over. It is necessary that it should be, as stated by the referee, found beyond a reasonable doubt that the person against whom the order is made has the funds or property in his possession or control.

On the 30th day of November, 1903, Samuel Feldser received $5,500 from Mr. Lessig, Jr., for the sale of the store, and immediately thereafter began paying off some of the creditors. To the Citizens’ National Bank he paid $1,500, and to the Tri-County Bank $500. He further states that he paid to various persons in Potts-town different sums, ranging from $15 to $500, making a total of small amounts of $1,200, and he gives the names and residences of these persons to whom these amounts were paid. The sums particularly specified as paid to these persons named do not total to the sum of $1,200, but there are others that he claims were paid, whose names he failed to recollect; and the evidence in regard to the $1,200 is very suspicious, it is true. But notwithstanding the fact of its being improbable, the names of the parties to whom the payments were made were in Pottstown, and the creditors could have ascertained whether or not he was telling the truth as to these payments ; and, in the absence of any evidence from them to the con*308trary, the character of his testimony and the circumstances as to the payments having been made are not sufficient to convince me beyond a reasonable doubt that this money was not paid out by him. But as to the balance, to wit, $2,250, which he claims he paid to his mother, I am convinced he still has it in his possession and control. The whole transaction, from the beginning, is of a character to indicate a fixed design to defraud creditors. The method of disposing of it to Lessig, and the story as to how it occurred, its transfer to the present owner, all indicate what was the object of the various transactions. But this can only throw light upon the question as to what Samuel Feldser was aiming to do by the transfer of the property, and would be no reason why an order should be made to require him to pay over money if he did not have it in his possession. His story of the sale and disbursement is so grotesque and improbable that no one can possibly believe it, and, taken together with other evidence and circumstances in the case, I have no doubt whatever but that he has now in his possession and control $2,250.

The exceptions to the referee’s order are therefore dismissed, and it is ordered and decreed by the court that Samuel Feldser be directed to pay over to J. Howard Reber, trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Rosa Feldser, bankrupt, the sum of $2,250 on or before February 15, 1905.