History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Facebook, Inc., Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation
3:18-md-02843
N.D. Cal.
Mar 3, 2020
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 3:18-md-02843-VC Document 381 Filed 03/03/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: FACEBOOK, INC. CONSUMER MDL No. 2843 Case No. 18-md-02843-VC PRIVACY USER PROFILE LITIGATION This document relates to: PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 36: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING ALL ACTIONS IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL

DISCOVERY Re: Dkt. No. 374

The plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery dating back to 2007 (rather than 2009, as Facebook proposes) is granted. It is highly plausible that documents dating back to 2007 could be probative of Facebook’s intent regarding the future handling of users’ private information. However, given the anticipated volume of the document productions, it appears unreasonable to require Facebook to produce privilege logs 30 days following production. Therefore, this aspect of the motion to compel is denied. Because it appears likely that the Court will ultimately be called upon to adjudicate disputes about whether Facebook has properly withheld documents on privilege grounds, and because those disputes could be important to the outcome of the case, the parties are directed to confer further and devise a system that allows Facebook sufficient time to prepare meaningful privilege logs without unduly delaying the proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2020

______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: In re Facebook, Inc., Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation
Court Name: District Court, N.D. California
Date Published: Mar 3, 2020
Docket Number: 3:18-md-02843
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.