78 Cal. 300 | Cal. | 1889
Appellant was appointed special administrator of said estate, and as such filed his account for settlement. Exceptions were filed thereto. The court allowed certain of the exceptions, and disallowed others. The court found that he had received $1,275.10, and that he should be credited with $848.25. Appellant claims that the court erred in disallowing a claim of four hundred dollars, which he paid Scholle Brothers for rent due them from deceased at the time of her death. It does not appear that this claim was ever presented to the court or judge, or by the court or judge directed to be paid. Article 7 of chapter 3 of the Code of Civil Pro
Order affirmed.
Thornton, J., and McFarland, J., concurred.
Hearing in Bank denied.